THE CHIEF – Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP Attorney Mercedes Maldonado Featured in the Chief-Leader for Major Victory in Employment Case

Westchester Wrongly Denied CO Time Off, Arbitrator Decides
By Mark Toor

June 7, 2011 – The Westchester County Department of Correction must come up with a better system for ensuring that Correction Officers can take their time off, an arbitrator ruled last month.

The May 12 ruling by Dennis J. Campagna came in the case of Patrick Garrett, a member of the Westchester Correction Officers Benevolent Association who requested a day off during Memorial Day weekend in 2009. A Captain denied his request, noting that outside of those on vacation for the entire week, only one Correction Officer was allowed to take the day off and someone else had already signed up.

New Rule on Vacation Leave
The union charged that the county had violated the contract, which allows at least 8.33 percent of a unit’s workforce to take off at the same time. The contract calls for this rule to be followed in the case of personal leave or supplemental time off, said Mercedes Maldonado of Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP, who represented the union. However, she said, it does not cover holiday or vacation leave.

“Correction work is one of the most stressful jobs out there,” Alonzo West, president of WCOBA, said in an interview. “People need their time off so they can come to work with a clear head and have some kind of normality in their lives.”

“You had people who couldn’t use their time under a contract that said time off was guaranteed if you had it,” he said. “We gave up things years ago to get these provisions in the contract.”

Until recently, Ms. Maldonado said, the county had followed the 8.33-percent rule for holiday and vacation leave, but then instituted its one-at-a-time rule for such leave. “This reduced the opportunity to take time off,” she said an interview. Under its own guidelines, the county could have had nine COs off, and when Mr. Garrett asked for a day it had only six taking off.

The union reasoned that because the contract required that holiday time be used before the end of the next calendar quarter, the county was obligated to make all efforts to allow an employee to use that time.

The county responded that staffing was a management prerogative and that no one would lose a day off, since COs who do not use their accrued time by the end of the quarter are paid for it in cash.

Must Make ‘Reasonable Efforts’
The arbitrator agreed with the union’s contention that the county must do everything it can to ensure that COs can use their time off. Mr. Campagna also found that “there is no logical reason” why the county should deny a CO’s request for the day off when the maximum number allowed off had not been reached.

The decision ordered the county to stop denying days off when that maximum was not reached, and to make “reasonable efforts” to ensure holidays or time off outside of a full week could be taken.

“It balances the interests involved,” Ms. Maldonado said, meaning both the county’s desire not to go below minimum staffing and the union’s desire that members can take time off.

“We’re still reviewing the decision and drafting a memorandum as to how it would be implemented,” said Justin Pine of the Westchester Department of Correction.

Mr. West said the time-off dispute was further evidence that the Correction Department “doesn’t want to honor the collective-bargaining agreement. What they can’t take away in contract negotiations, they try to litigate away or legislate away.”

Westchester Wrongly Denied CO Time Off, Arbitrator Decides

By Mark Toor


June 7, 2011 – The Westchester County Department of Correction must come up with a better system for ensuring that Correction Officers can take their time off, an arbitrator ruled last month.

The May 12 ruling by Dennis J. Campagna came in the case of Patrick Garrett, a member of the Westchester Correction Officers Benevolent Association who requested a day off during Memorial Day weekend in 2009. A Captain denied his request, noting that outside of those on vacation for the entire week, only one Correction Officer was allowed to take the day off and someone else had already signed up.

New Rule on Vacation Leave
The union charged that the county had violated the contract, which allows at least 8.33 percent of a unit’s workforce to take off at the same time. The contract calls for this rule to be followed in the case of personal leave or supplemental time off, said Mercedes Maldonado of Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP, who represented the union. However, she said, it does not cover holiday or vacation leave.

“Correction work is one of the most stressful jobs out there,” Alonzo West, president of WCOBA, said in an interview. “People need their time off so they can come to work with a clear head and have some kind of normality in their lives.”

“You had people who couldn’t use their time under a contract that said time off was guaranteed if you had it,” he said. “We gave up things years ago to get these provisions in the contract.”

Until recently, Ms. Maldonado said, the county had followed the 8.33-percent rule for holiday and vacation leave, but then instituted its one-at-a-time rule for such leave. “This reduced the opportunity to take time off,” she said an interview. Under its own guidelines, the county could have had nine COs off, and when Mr. Garrett asked for a day it had only six taking off.

The union reasoned that because the contract required that holiday time be used before the end of the next calendar quarter, the county was obligated to make all efforts to allow an employee to use that time.

The county responded that staffing was a management prerogative and that no one would lose a day off, since COs who do not use their accrued time by the end of the quarter are paid for it in cash.

Must Make ‘Reasonable Efforts’
The arbitrator agreed with the union’s contention that the county must do everything it can to ensure that COs can use their time off. Mr. Campagna also found that “there is no logical reason” why the county should deny a CO’s request for the day off when the maximum number allowed off had not been reached.

The decision ordered the county to stop denying days off when that maximum was not reached, and to make “reasonable efforts” to ensure holidays or time off outside of a full week could be taken.

“It balances the interests involved,” Ms. Maldonado said, meaning both the county’s desire not to go below minimum staffing and the union’s desire that members can take time off.

“We’re still reviewing the decision and drafting a memorandum as to how it would be implemented,” said Justin Pine of the Westchester Department of Correction.

Mr. West said the time-off dispute was further evidence that the Correction Department “doesn’t want to honor the collective-bargaining agreement. What they can’t take away in contract negotiations, they try to litigate away or legislate away.”

DAILY NEWS – Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP Attorney Mathew Paulose Featured in the Daily News

Manhattan mom sues preschool for damaging 4y/o daughter’s Ivy League Chance
By Jose Martinez

March 15, 2011 – A Manhattan mom is suing a pricey preschool for dumping her “very smart” 4-year-old with tykes half her age and boring her with lessons about shapes and colors.

In court papers, Nicole Imprescia suggests York Avenue Preschool jeopardized little Lucia’s chances of getting into an elite private school or, one day, the Ivy League.

She’s demanding a refund of the $19,000 tuition and class-action status for other toddlers who weren’t properly prepped for the standardized test that can mean the difference between Dalton and – gasp! – public school.

“This is about a theft where a business advertises as one thing and is actually another,” said Mathew Paulose, a lawyer for the outraged mom.

“They’re nabbing $19,000 and making a run for it.”

Impressed by the school’s pledge to ready its young students for the ERB – a test used for admission at top private schools – Imprescia enrolled her daughter at York in 2009.

A month into this school year, she transferred the child out of the Upper East Side center because she was forced to slum with 2-year-olds.

“Indeed, the school proved not to be a school at all, but just one big playroom,” the suit says.

The court papers implied the school could have damaged Lucia’s chances of getting into a top college, citing an article that identifies preschools as the first step to “the Ivy League.”

Fortunately, Imprescia’s lawyer said, the tot’s prospects aren’t doomed.

“Lucia Imprescia, for the record, will get into an Ivy League school – York Avenue Preschool notwithstanding,” said Paulose, of the firm Koehler & Isaacs.

“The child is very smart and will do well in life.”

York’s owner, Michael Branciforte, declined comment on the suit, but his lawyer said the school has a “great reputation, which is richly deserved.”

“They’ve never had a problem like this and they only hope the child has found a school that better suits her needs,” lawyer William Wachtel said.

On its website, York touts its music and physical education programs, weekly library trips, and French classes for four-year-olds.

The York Avenue Preschool Curriculum is designed for the specific age group: “Twos, Threes or Fours,” the site boasts.

Imprescia called that a “complete fraud.”

“They put a bunch of kids of different ages together and gave her some excuse about construction,” Paulose said.

At the York Ave. campus, where many kids were being picked up by nannies pushing luxury strollers, parents were wary of speaking with a reporter yesterday, saying it could endanger their kids’ slots.

But the mother of one 3-year said she’s had nothing but good experiences.

“She’s been happy. We’ve been happy,” the mom said.

DAILY NEWS – Manhattan mom sues preschool for damaging 4y/o daughter’s Ivy League Chance

By Jose Martinez


March 15, 2011 – A Manhattan mom is suing a pricey preschool for dumping her “very smart” 4-year-old with tykes half her age and boring her with lessons about shapes and colors.

In court papers, Nicole Imprescia suggests York Avenue Preschool jeopardized little Lucia’s chances of getting into an elite private school or, one day, the Ivy League.

She’s demanding a refund of the $19,000 tuition and class-action status for other toddlers who weren’t properly prepped for the standardized test that can mean the difference between Dalton and – gasp! – public school.

“This is about a theft where a business advertises as one thing and is actually another,” said Mathew Paulose, a lawyer for the outraged mom.

“They’re nabbing $19,000 and making a run for it.”

Impressed by the school’s pledge to ready its young students for the ERB – a test used for admission at top private schools – Imprescia enrolled her daughter at York in 2009.

A month into this school year, she transferred the child out of the Upper East Side center because she was forced to slum with 2-year-olds.

“Indeed, the school proved not to be a school at all, but just one big playroom,” the suit says.

The court papers implied the school could have damaged Lucia’s chances of getting into a top college, citing an article that identifies preschools as the first step to “the Ivy League.”

Fortunately, Imprescia’s lawyer said, the tot’s prospects aren’t doomed.

“Lucia Imprescia, for the record, will get into an Ivy League school – York Avenue Preschool notwithstanding,” said Paulose, of the firm Koehler & Isaacs.

“The child is very smart and will do well in life.”

York’s owner, Michael Branciforte, declined comment on the suit, but his lawyer said the school has a “great reputation, which is richly deserved.”

“They’ve never had a problem like this and they only hope the child has found a school that better suits her needs,” lawyer William Wachtel said.

On its website, York touts its music and physical education programs, weekly library trips, and French classes for four-year-olds.

The York Avenue Preschool Curriculum is designed for the specific age group: “Twos, Threes or Fours,” the site boasts.

Imprescia called that a “complete fraud.”

“They put a bunch of kids of different ages together and gave her some excuse about construction,” Paulose said.

At the York Ave. campus, where many kids were being picked up by nannies pushing luxury strollers, parents were wary of speaking with a reporter yesterday, saying it could endanger their kids’ slots.

But the mother of one 3-year said she’s had nothing but good experiences.

“She’s been happy. We’ve been happy,” the mom said.

THE CHIEF – Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP Attorney Mercedes Maldonado Featured in the Chief-Leader

Unkind Cut Heals As Probie Fired Over Surgery is Rehired
By Mark Toor


February 18, 2011 – The city has agreed to give a Probationary Correction Officer her job back after she was fired for absenteeism because she took 13 days of sick leave for gall-bladder surgery.

The officer, Christina Maldonado, was hired Feb. 28, 2008 and was almost at the end of her probation on Jan. 20, 2010 when her gallstones were removed. Ms. Maldonado was paid for the sick leave; the Department of Correction has an unlimited-sick-leave policy like that of the NYPD.

Both her doctor and the agency’s Health Management Division agreed she could return to work with medical restrictions on Feb. 8, 2010. The DOC said she could work without restrictions starting Feb. 26.

About a month later, DOC gave Ms. Maldonado a “chronic absent” designation because of the surgery-related absences, and on April 16 she was terminated. According to court papers, the decision was based only on her sick-leave usage, and her job performance was not taken into account.

After her termination, she believed that her education in criminal justice would be rendered worthless, said her attorney, Mercedes M. Maldonado (no relation) of Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP. But even more stressful was the fact that her 5-year-old son was hospitalized for asthma at a time when she had no health insurance, attorney Maldonado said.

Uphill Battle
“Any probationary-termination case is an uphill battle,” she said. But because the case involved a city department, Mercedes Maldonado was able to bring suit in Manhattan Supreme Court under the city’s Human-Rights Law, which she said was far more liberal than state or Federal law. The city’s definition of disability is more expansive, she said, and it puts a greater burden on the employer in a dispute over reasonable accommodation of a disabled employee.

Under the settlement, Christina Maldonado was rehired effective Feb. 7 with back pay and allowances. She must serve a final three months of probation. The city does not admit any wrongdoing.

“We believe the settlement is in the best interest of all parties,” said a spokeswoman for the city Law Department.

Website developed in accordance with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0.
If you encounter any issues while using this site, please contact us: 917.551.1300