COs Acquitted of Beating Inmate At Rikers and Then Attempting Cover-Up
March 10, 2014

---

A Bronx judge last week acquitted two Correction Officers charged with beating an inmate who was at the center of an alleged work stoppage by the Correction Officers Benevolent Association in November.
State Supreme Court Justice George Villegas declared Louis Pinto Jr. not guilty of assaulting a prisoner, and found both Mr. Pinto and Kevin Gilkes not guilty of 17 other charges, most involving falsifying reports.

‘Justice System Worked’

Justice Villegas, who decided the case instead of a jury, did not explain the reasons for his decision, said Mr. Gilkes’s attorney, Peter Troxler of Koehler and Isaacs. But, he said, “The justice system worked the way it should.”

Mr. Troxler said the verdict ended a period of “substantial hardships that nearly caused complete financial insolvency” for the two men, who were suspended without pay. He said they were looking forward to getting back to work.

Mr. Gilkes was charged with shoving inmate Dapree Peterson, 21, into a wall and then hitting him while Mr. Pinto watched. Mr. Pinto and Mr. Gilkes then filed reports saying that Mr. Peterson had threatened them by stepping forward aggressively, that Mr. Gilkes defended himself and that the two of them guided Mr. Peterson to the floor.

Prosecutors presented a video they said showed Mr. Gilkes attacking Mr. Peterson. Mr. Troxler said Judge Villegas had clearly taken a different interpretation from the video.

He said Mr. Peterson, who had been previously arrested in a dozen violent felonies and was nicknamed “Terror,” had told a fellow inmate he was going to stage an incident that would enable him to sue the city. When he eventually reached the courtroom, Mr. Peterson testified that Mr. Gilkes had hit him in the face after he requested that his handcuffs be loosened.

Union Assails DOC

The inmate is in Rikers awaiting trial on charges that he robbed and knifed a subway rider.
Norman Seabrook, president of COBA, used Judge Villegas’s decision as a vehicle to criticize the Department of Correction.

“This is indicative of the way the New York City Department of Correction continues to use Correction Officers as scapegoats for their shortcomings,” he said in a statement. “We applaud the judge’s decision and commend the legal system for its accuracy in interpreting the law. Hopefully, now these Correction Officers that have been vindicated can get back to a normal life after the complete embarrassment that the managers at the Department of Correction have put them through.”

Wouldn’t Take Him to Court

Mr. Peterson was aboard a bus on Rikers Island Nov. 18 for a trip to testify in the trial of Mr. Gilkes and Mr.Pinto when Correction Officers refused to drive any of the 33 buses taking inmates to court and medical visits, saying various defects made them unsafe to use. Court proceedings were delayed around the city.

The Bloomberg administration filed suit against the union a week later, charging that Mr. Seabrook and COBA’s executive board had led the COs in an illegal job action. “[D]efendants’ action to remove necessary buses from the fleet for was a subterfuge intended to protest the prosecution of other Correction Officers for illegal activity,” according to the suit.

The union has not commented beyond saying Nov. 26 that it was investigating the matter. “We are confident that when completed, our investigation will establish that the city’s allegations as set out in their complaint are entirely without merit and baseless,” COBA said.

Mr. Troxler detailed the hardships Mr. Gilkes and Mr. Pinto had faced while suspended. “Employment while suspended with an open felony criminal case presented nearly insurmountable obstacles for employment for both men,” he said.

Financial Hardships

Mr. Gilkes did find a job as a driver for a rental-car company, but it paid only one-sixth of his salary as a CO, Mr. Troxler said. As a result, the lawyer said, he was unable to pay some debts or contribute to the costs of educating two children.

“Louis Pinto’s hardship was even more pronounced, and had to rely on his extended family to make ends meet, straining the family beyond anything it had known,” Mr. Troxler said.

Mr. Gilkes and Mr. Pinto were advised by their attorneys not to speak to the media.

By NATE SCHWEBER
March 4, 2014

Two Rikers Island guards accused of assaulting a prisoner and covering up their actions were found not guilty Monday on all charges, after a trial that escalated tensions between the city and the correction officers’ union.

The guards, Louis Pinto Jr. and Kevin Gilkes, who chose to be tried by a judge rather than by a jury, were cleared of all charges stemming from what prosecutors said was an assault of a prisoner, Dapree Peterson, on Dec. 3, 2011.

Judge George Villegas of Bronx Supreme Court found Mr. Pinto not guilty of assault of a prisoner, and found both officers not guilty of 17 other charges, including official misconduct and falsifying a report.

“The justice system worked the way it should,” said Peter C. Troxler, Mr. Gilkes’s attorney. “I just wish it had happened quicker.”

The trial took an unexpected turn when Mr. Peterson failed to show up in court on Nov. 18 to testify against the officers. Correction officers had halted prisoner transports that day, claiming a wave of safety problems with the buses that usually ferried defendants between Rikers and the courts.

Mr. Peterson finally appeared in court the next afternoon, after which the judge suspended the trial for two weeks.

Dozens of defendants missed court appearances or other appointments because of the bus slowdown, but attention quickly turned to the case involving Mr. Peterson, who had been in custody after being arrested and charged with robbery and assault. When Mr. Peterson, 21, finally did testify on Dec. 5, he said Mr. Pinto had punched him in the face.

Norman Seabrook, president of the union, the Correction Officers’ Benevolent Association, praised the verdict and scolded city officials.

“Hopefully now these Correction Officers that have been vindicated can get back to a normal life after the complete embarrassment that the managers at the Department of Correction have put them through,” Mr. Seabrook said in a statement on Monday afternoon.

The flare-up between the union and City Hall roiled the final weeks of the administration of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. He charged Mr. Seabrook and the union with intimidating a witness and wasting public funds. Lawyers for Mr. Bloomberg filed suit in Manhattan Criminal Court, and sought to fine the union $1 million a day for any repeat of the shutdown.

Courts around the city ground to a near standstill during the two days in November that the buses did not run. According to court papers, 44 inmates missed court appearances and 49 missed health appointments.

Inside the Bronx courtroom where the officers were tried, Judge Villegas, who at times had criticized the union’s actions, made note that the trial received “an abundance of publicity last year.” Then he read his verdicts.

Mr. Pinto, 48, and Mr. Gilkes, 31, dressed in dark suits, stood with their heads bowed as Judge Villegas repeated “not guilty” eighteen times.

From the courtroom, filled with relatives and friends of the defendants, came a whispered woman’s voice: “Thank you.” Outside the courtroom, the two men hugged their supporters and their lawyers.

A spokesman for District Attorney Robert T. Johnson said the office had no comment on the verdict.

Mr. Gilkes and Mr. Pinto also declined to comment after the verdict.

PRESS RELEASE

Contact:
Michael Skelly
917-551-1354
mskelly@idcwlaw.com
Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP

CO Cleared of 11 Criminal Counts in Bronx State Supreme Court

Bronx, New York–March 3, 2014—In a major legal victory today in Bronx State Supreme Court, Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP Attorney Peter Troxler successfully won an acquittal for his client, a New York City Correction Officer, who was accused of getting into an unnecessary Use of Force Incident on December 3, 2011 with a Rikers Island inmate and then lying about it. The Correction Officer, Kevin Gilikes, had been indicted on eleven criminal counts and a fellow Correction Officer, Louis Pinto, who was also exonerated today, faced seven criminal counts.

“We are incredibly gratified by the verdict of Justice George Villegas today in acquitting Kevin Gilkes and Louis Pinto of all criminal charges,” said Peter Troxler, the attorney for Gilkes. “Both Officers have always maintained that the force used by Officer Gilkes in defending himself from a violent inmate assault was appropriate and commensurate with the force used by the inmate.”

Mr. Troxler continued, “It was particularly gratifying that the inmate who brought these allegations was found to have been incredible by the Judge in his review of the evidence contained in the surveillance footage, the inmate’s false testimony, and his extensive criminal history.”

“I would also like to applaud the diligent work of my co-counsel, Paul London, who successfully defeated the charges brought against Correction Officer Pinto. Justice has been served.”
Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP is a full service law firm, lead by Richard J. Koehler and Steven Isaacs. The office is located at 61 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10006. For more information about their practice areas and attorneys, please visit www.idcwlaw.com or follow them on Twitter @koehlerisaacs.

In honor of his extraordinary generosity, loyalty and vision, a lecture hall in the New Building was named after Board member, alumnus and former John Jay tenured professor Richard J. Koehler, on September 24, 2013.

See the Full Article Here

By: Felicia Pinto

In today’s real estate market, a potential home buyer looking to purchase a home, will almost surely come across a short sale. 

A short sale is when a lender agrees to accept less than the outstanding mortgage balance.  When home owners can no longer afford to make mortgage payments, rather than allow the home to be sold in a foreclosure sale, they will negotiate a short sale with their lender.  It’s often referred to as a, “pre-foreclosure.”

A short sale can often be a bargain for a purchaser, but you need to know a few things.  First, short sales can take a long time because the seller’s lender must approve the sale.  The seller must submit a short sale package detailing their financial situation, and must negotiate the purchase price.  The lender is going to make sure it gets the best possible price, so you may end up waiting several months for an approval.

Second, if the lender does approve the transaction, you will have a deadline to close.  Often, the lender will give a 15-30 day window to close, or the approval is rescinded.  It’s a good idea to have your mortgage in order so you can adhere to the lender’s deadline.  If you are not able to close within that time frame, the seller may be able to obtain an extension from the lender, but that’s not always the case. 

Third, you are purchasing the home in “as is” condition.  Procuring a home inspection prior to entering into contract on the home is extremely important.  The seller usually does not have the funds to fix any physical problems with the home, so you need to know what issues exist, if any, so you can walk away if the problems will be too costly to remedy.

Lastly, once your offer is submitted, the seller’s lender may counter.  If the counter offer is not considerably higher than your original offer, and it is within your budget, you may consider accepting the counter offer.  It is entirely possible you are getting the home for well under its true market value.  Your other options are to try and negotiate with the lender and counter back, or walk away from the transaction. 

The short sale process is not for the faint of heart, but in the long run, it can truly be worth the wait if you have the patience. 

Felicia Pinto, Esq. is an Associate in the Real Estate division at Isaacs, Devasia, Castro & Wien LLP. For more information on this topic you can contact her at 917.551.1325 or at fpinto@idcwlaw.com.